📝 Online Quiz Engine
Daily Practice Sheet — 50 Questions
Take this quiz online with timer, mark-for-review, instant scorecard, percentile, and per-question explanations. CLAT scoring scheme: +1 / -0.25.
Daily MCQ Paper — 13 April 2026
50 questions across all sections. Use the practice interface to attempt; review answers and explanations after submission.
- Q1. Education was moved to the Concurrent List by the
- 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976
- 44th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1978
- 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992
- 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002
- Q2. Public order and Police are entries in the
- Union List
- State List
- Concurrent List
- Residuary powers
- Q3. The Tenth Schedule was added by the
- 42nd Amendment
- 44th Amendment
- 52nd Amendment
- 61st Amendment
- Q4. The Twelfth Schedule contains how many subjects for Municipalities
- 12
- 15
- 18
- 21
- Q5. Kihoto Hollohan v Zachillhu (1992) struck down which paragraph of the Tenth Schedule
- Para 2
- Para 6
- Para 7
- Para 8
- Q6. SR Bommai v Union of India (1994) is associated with
- Anti-defection
- President's Rule under Art 356 — judicial review
- Reservation
- Right to Property
- Q7. Concurrent List entry on which both Centre and State can legislate is
- Defence
- Education
- Police
- Foreign affairs
- Q8. Entry 1 of the Union List relates to
- Defence of India
- Foreign affairs
- Public order
- Police
- Q9. The Eleventh Schedule contains how many subjects for Panchayats
- 27
- 29
- 31
- 33
- Q10. The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments came into force in
- 1991
- 1992
- 1993
- 1994
- Q11. Robbery under BNS 2023 is defined in
- Section 309
- Section 310
- Section 311
- Section 312
- Q12. Dacoity under BNS 2023 requires participation of
- At least 3 persons
- At least 5 persons
- At least 7 persons
- Any number
- Q13. Extortion is dealt with under BNS
- Section 308
- Section 309
- Section 318
- Section 320
- Q14. Cheating is defined under BNS
- Section 318
- Section 319
- Section 320
- Section 321
- Q15. Hridaya Ranjan Verma v State of Bihar (2000) clarified the distinction between
- Theft and extortion
- Cheating and breach of contract
- Robbery and dacoity
- Murder and culpable homicide
- Q16. Criminal breach of trust under BNS is defined in
- Section 305
- Section 314
- Section 316
- Section 318
- Q17. State of Maharashtra v Mohd. Yakub (1980) is a landmark on
- Attempt to commit offence (smuggling)
- Insanity defence
- Right of private defence
- Confessions
- Q18. Pyare Lal Bhargava v State of Rajasthan (1963) held
- Temporary deprivation of property amounts to theft
- Only permanent deprivation is theft
- Theft requires force
- Theft and robbery are identical
- Q19. Aggravated form of cheating with delivery of property is under BNS
- Section 318(1)
- Section 318(2)
- Section 318(4)
- Section 320
- Q20. Forgery under BNS is defined in
- Section 336
- Section 340
- Section 463 (BNS retains numbering)
- Section 318
- Q21. Zero-FIR concept means
- FIR with zero serial number that can be filed at any police station
- FIR for non-cognisable offences
- FIR with no charge
- FIR registered against zero accused
- Q22. Lalita Kumari v Government of UP (2014) mandates
- Compulsory registration of FIR for cognisable offences
- Magistrate's permission before FIR
- Closure of all FIRs in 30 days
- Bail-only procedure
- Q23. FIR for cognisable offence is provided under BNSS
- Section 154
- Section 173
- Section 197
- Section 200
- Q24. Arnesh Kumar v State of Bihar (2014) laid down guidelines on
- Bail in dowry cases
- Arrest under Section 41 CrPC for offences <7 years
- Sentencing
- Plea bargaining
- Q25. BNSS Section 35 (corresponding to CrPC 41) deals with
- Search
- Arrest by police without warrant
- Bail
- Investigation
- Q26. Anticipatory bail is provided under BNSS
- Section 482
- Section 438 of CrPC
- Section 35
- Section 154
- Q27. Police investigation timeline for cognisable offences punishable with imprisonment up to 10 years under BNSS is
- 30 days
- 60 days
- 90 days
- As prescribed
- Q28. Confession to a police officer is inadmissible under
- BSA Section 22
- BSA Section 23
- BSA Section 24
- BSA Section 25 of IEA / 23 of BSA
- Q29. Pulukuri Kotayya v Emperor (1947) is the locus classicus on
- Section 27 of IEA — recovery from accused
- Hearsay
- Burden of proof
- Estoppel
- Q30. Admission is defined under BSA
- Section 14
- Section 15
- Section 16
- Section 17 (of IEA)
- Q31. Aghnoo Nagesia v State of Bihar (1966) held
- Confession to police is admissible if voluntary
- Inculpatory and exculpatory parts of a confession to police are inadmissible together; prosecution cannot pick-and-choose
- Confession in court is always inadmissible
- Confessions need not be proved
- Q32. The distinction between admission and confession is that
- Confession is in civil cases only
- Admission is statement against interest in civil/criminal proceeding; confession is admission of guilt by accused in criminal proceeding
- They are identical
- Confession is hearsay
- Q33. Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 provides that all agreements are contracts if made by
- Free consent of competent parties for lawful consideration and lawful object
- Mere agreement
- Written form only
- Stamped paper
- Q34. Mohori Bibee v Dharmodas Ghose (1903) held
- Minor's contract is voidable
- Minor's contract is void ab initio
- Minor's contract is valid
- Minor can ratify on majority
- Q35. Lalman Shukla v Gauri Datt (1913) held
- Acceptance without knowledge of offer is no acceptance
- Offer once made cannot be revoked
- Cross-offers form contract
- Reward cases need writing
- Q36. Section 73 of the Contract Act covers
- Quasi-contract
- Compensation for loss caused by breach
- Specific performance
- Frustration
- Q37. Doctrine of frustration is codified in
- Section 32
- Section 56
- Section 73
- Section 74
- Q38. Vicarious liability of master for servant requires
- Servant acted in course of employment
- Master's express authorisation
- Servant's consent
- None of the above
- Q39. MC Mehta v Union of India (1987) Oleum Gas Leak case introduced
- Strict liability
- Absolute liability for hazardous industries (no exceptions)
- Vicarious liability
- Public liability
- Q40. The rule in Rylands v Fletcher (1868) imposes
- Strict liability for escape of dangerous things
- Vicarious liability
- Negligence-based liability
- No liability
- Q41. Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) is famous for
- Neighbour principle of duty of care in negligence
- Strict liability
- Vicarious liability
- Trespass
- Q42. Special Marriage Act 1954 applies to
- Hindus only
- Persons of any religion who choose civil marriage
- Christians only
- Muslims only
- Q43. Shayara Bano v Union of India (2017) struck down
- Triple talaq (talaq-e-biddat) as unconstitutional
- Polygamy
- Maintenance under Section 125
- Mehr
- Q44. Sarla Mudgal v Union of India (1995) held
- Conversion to Islam without dissolving prior Hindu marriage is bigamy
- Triple talaq is valid
- Polygamy is unconstitutional
- Live-in is bigamy
- Q45. Daniel Latifi v Union of India (2001) interpreted
- Section 125 CrPC
- Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 — maintenance beyond iddat
- Triple talaq
- Polygamy
- Q46. Section 53A of TPA deals with
- Fraudulent transfer
- Part performance
- Lis pendens
- Notice
- Q47. Doctrine of Lis Pendens is codified in TPA
- Section 41
- Section 52
- Section 53
- Section 53A
- Q48. Section 6 of the Transfer of Property Act 1882 provides
- What may be transferred
- What cannot be transferred (spes successionis, right of re-entry, etc.)
- Mortgages
- Lease
- Q49. The current Chief Justice of India (as of April 2026) is
- D Y Chandrachud
- Sanjiv Khanna
- B R Gavai
- J B Pardiwala
- Q50. "Ignorantia juris non excusat" means
- Ignorance of law is no excuse
- Justice delayed is justice denied
- Hear the other side
- Innocent until proven guilty