📝 Online Quiz Engine
Daily Practice Sheet — 50 Questions
Take this quiz online with timer, mark-for-review, instant scorecard, percentile, and per-question explanations. CLAT scoring scheme: +1 / -0.25.
Daily MCQ Paper — 23 April 2026
50 questions across all sections. Use the practice interface to attempt; review answers and explanations after submission.
- Q1. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) was significant for
- Holding 39th Amendment's clause 4 unconstitutional
- Validating internal Emergency
- Striking down NJAC
- Recognising Right to Privacy
- Q2. Minerva Mills v Union of India (1980) struck down which clauses of the 42nd Amendment?
- Sections 4 and 55
- Section 4 (Article 31C) and Section 55 (Articles 368(4)-(5))
- Section 1 only
- Section 28 only
- Q3. Waman Rao v Union of India (1981) clarified that
- Ninth Schedule entries before 24 April 1973 are immune
- All Ninth Schedule entries are immune
- No Ninth Schedule immunity
- Only post-1980 entries are immune
- Q4. State of West Bengal v Union of India (1962) held that
- States are sovereign
- Indian federation is not a "compact" of sovereign states
- Centre cannot acquire state property
- Article 356 is illegal
- Q5. The 2018 Amendment to the SC/ST Act inserted Section
- 18A
- 17C
- 22B
- 15A
- Q6. ITC Ltd v Agricultural Produce Market Committee (2002) is significant for
- GST rulings
- Interpretation of "free trade and commerce" under Article 301
- Reservation in promotion
- Education as fundamental right
- Q7. Article 226 differs from Article 32 primarily in that
- 226 is fundamental, 32 is statutory
- 226 is a wider remedy available against any person for any legal right
- Both are identical
- 32 is wider in scope
- Q8. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v State of Maharashtra (2018) led to a controversy over
- SC/ST Act dilution by SC
- Reservation in promotions
- Article 370
- Aadhaar
- Q9. Article 32 was termed by Dr. Ambedkar as
- The most peripheral article
- The heart and soul of the Constitution
- A redundant article
- A directive principle
- Q10. "Constitutional morality" was emphasised in
- Naz Foundation
- Navtej Singh Johar v UoI
- Both A and B
- Only A
- Q11. "Theft" under BNS 2023 is defined in Section
- 303
- 305
- 311
- 315
- Q12. "Theft in a dwelling-house" under BNS is in Section
- 304
- 305
- 306
- 309
- Q13. Punishment for theft under BNS Section 303(2) is
- Up to 1 year
- Up to 3 years
- Up to 5 years
- Up to 7 years
- Q14. "Robbery" is theft or extortion accompanied by
- Force or threat
- Trespass
- Criminal breach of trust
- Cheating
- Q15. "Extortion" under BNS Section 308 requires
- Use of weapon
- Putting any person in fear of injury and dishonestly inducing delivery
- Trespass
- Forgery
- Q16. "Dacoity" under BNS requires
- 3 or more persons
- 5 or more persons
- 2 persons
- 10 persons
- Q17. Punishment for dacoity is up to
- 7 years RI
- 10 years RI
- Life imprisonment
- Death sentence only
- Q18. "Mischief" under BNS Section 324 requires
- Wrongful loss or damage to property
- Theft
- Trespass
- Cheating
- Q19. "Criminal trespass" under BNS Section 329 requires entry with intent to
- Cause harm
- Commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy
- Steal only
- Damage property only
- Q20. "House-trespass" under BNS is criminal trespass into
- Any place
- Any building, tent or vessel used as a dwelling/place of worship/property custody
- Government buildings only
- Banks only
- Q21. BNSS 2023 General Powers of Magistrate are in Sections
- 4-5
- 15-25
- 41-43
- 125-130
- Q22. BNSS Section 18 deals with
- Powers of police
- Sentences which Magistrates may pass
- Bail
- Arrest
- Q23. BNSS provides for "Zero FIR" registration
- In a separate section
- Through Section 173 / 175 with mandate that no jurisdiction objection is allowed
- Only by court order
- Only in cognizable cases
- Q24. Time limit for filing chargesheet under BNSS for offence punishable up to 10 years is
- 60 days
- 90 days
- 180 days
- 120 days
- Q25. Appeals from convictions in High Court (sentence > 7 years) to Supreme Court lie under
- Article 132
- Article 134
- Section 415 BNSS
- Both B and C
- Q26. BNSS Section 414 corresponds to CrPC Section
- 377
- 378
- 386
- 389
- Q27. Revision powers of HC and Sessions Courts are in BNSS Sections
- 438-442
- 438-442 (≈ CrPC 397-401)
- 421-426
- 125-130
- Q28. "Presumption" in BSA distinguishes between
- Rebuttable and irrebuttable
- May presume / shall presume / conclusive proof
- Direct and indirect
- Civil and criminal
- Q29. BSA Section 80 (presumptions) corresponds to IEA Section
- 79
- 80
- 85
- 86
- Q30. "May presume" gives the court
- No discretion
- Discretion to presume or call for proof
- Mandatory presumption
- Conclusive presumption
- Q31. "Conclusive proof" is
- Rebuttable
- Treated as proved and no contrary evidence is admissible
- Discretionary
- Presumed only in civil cases
- Q32. Presumption of dowry death under BSA Section 118 (≈ IEA 113B) arises if
- Death within 1 year of marriage
- Death within 7 years of marriage by burns/bodily injury or otherwise than under normal circumstances + soon before her death she was subjected to cruelty/harassment for dowry
- Death by accident
- Death by suicide alone
- Q33. Lalman Shukla v Gauri Dutt (1913) is authority for the proposition that
- Acceptance must be communicated
- Knowledge of offer is necessary for acceptance
- Past consideration is good
- Standard form contracts are valid
- Q34. Coercion is defined under Indian Contract Act Section
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Q35. "An agreement enforceable by law is a contract" — this definition is in Section
- 2(b)
- 2(g)
- 2(h)
- 10
- Q36. "Undue influence" under Section 16 requires that
- One party uses physical force
- One party is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses it to obtain unfair advantage
- One party is wealthier
- Misrepresentation is shown
- Q37. "Quasi-contract" obligations are dealt with in Sections
- 60-62
- 68-72
- 73-75
- 89-92
- Q38. "Res ipsa loquitur" applies when
- The thing speaks for itself — the accident itself implies negligence
- Defendant admits
- Statute requires
- Court orders
- Q39. "Tort" is best described as
- Statutory wrong
- Civil wrong remediable by unliquidated damages
- Criminal wrong
- Equitable wrong
- Q40. Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) is the foundation of
- Strict liability
- Modern law of negligence — neighbour principle
- Vicarious liability
- Defamation
- Q41. Rylands v Fletcher (1868) established the doctrine of
- Negligence
- Strict liability for non-natural use of land
- Vicarious liability
- Volenti
- Q42. Voidable marriages under Hindu Marriage Act are governed by Section
- 5
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Q43. Time-limit to seek annulment for fraud / force under Section 12(2)(a) HMA is
- 6 months
- 1 year
- 3 years
- No limit
- Q44. Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma (2020) clarified that
- Daughters get coparcenary only if father alive on 9 Sept 2005
- Daughters get coparcenary rights by birth — father need not be alive on 9 Sept 2005
- HSA 2005 is prospective only
- Daughters lose rights on marriage
- Q45. Hindu Succession Act Section 6 (as amended 2005) provides that
- Daughters get coparcenary rights by birth, equal to sons
- Daughters get rights only on intestate succession
- Daughters get only stridhan
- No change from 1956
- Q46. "Gift" under Transfer of Property Act is defined in Section
- 105
- 118
- 122
- 130
- Q47. Acceptance of a gift under TPA Section 122 must be made
- Before donor's death
- While donor is still alive and capable of giving
- Within 1 year
- Anytime
- Q48. "Actionable claim" is defined under TPA Section
- 118
- 130
- 105
- 58
- Q49. The judgment in Vishaka v State of Rajasthan (1997) led to enactment of
- POSH Act 2013
- Domestic Violence Act 2005
- Dowry Prohibition Act
- Maternity Benefit Act
- Q50. The CJI of India as of May 2025 is
- D Y Chandrachud
- Sanjiv Khanna
- B R Gavai
- J B Pardiwala